4 Responses to The Gaia Infiltration

  1. Hags February 26, 2012 at 1:57 pm

    Three strikes and YER OUT!
    Strike one, was Prof Ross McKittrick disproving the famed Mann graph or ‘hockey stick’ graph that showed a huge ‘warming leap.’ Trouble was, prof Mann did the math wrong making his findings innacurate.
    Strike two was the efforts of Phil Jones and others at East Anglia Univ to fudge data and silence critics.
    Strike three was the IPCC stating that the Himalyan glaciers were melting due to Climate Change…except, they had to backtrack’cause the glaciers weren’t receding at all.
    For me, Global warming/Climate change is about a leftist/environmental political agenda(as stated above)and has little to do with science.

  2. Andrew March 5, 2012 at 3:36 pm

    I think it’s hilarious that people such as you two still exist. Scratch that, not hilarious, down right disturbing.

    I strongly suggest taking off your tin foil hats and take a look around you. At the very least you should join the rest of us in 2012 and begin saying climate change rather than global warming. No one says global warming anymore besides far right conservatives, which you obviously are.

    Your opinion, which you are entitled to unfortunately, is completely wrong.

    I very much hope there is a threat to our way of life, since that is exactly what is wrong with our society, especially for those of us who are lucky enough to be born in first-world countries such as ours. How nice it must be to have an opinion on the falsehood of climate change while comfortably sitting in a chair, surrounded by four walls, heated by one of many different fuel sourced furnaces, with a food market several minutes away with every food at your very fingertips shipped and trucked in from its source several thousand miles away.

    How ignorant are you?

    The only comfort I have in reading this poorly written opinion is that I will be only one of maybe a dozen, two dozen at most.

    Do yourself a favor and step outside of yourself, for just a second, and take a look at the broader picture on a global scale.

  3. Hags March 6, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    Mr. Mush. your insults are pedantic, lame and a tad obstreperous to say the least. Try again and this time plse don’t hold back…show some passion for once in your perfect yet unenviable green life…and don’t forget to drink the’special Kool-Ade.’ xoxo Jimmy the Hags

  4. Chris Baker March 8, 2012 at 5:36 pm

    I was going to send Andrew a witty rejoinder but it is useless to debate with blockheads. Andrews comments are a good example of an adhominin in action.
    He mananaged all the bluster and indignation at the “earth hating” heathens and manages to vilify me with all rhetoric you would absorb on a campus or hear on television. I like how he manages to attack my character at every opportunity;(courage with online annonymity is breath taking) without debating a single point the article was trying to say. In the midst of his mudslinging he didn’t bring up the false government environmental movement nor agenda 21. So unless you have something intellegent to say I will no longer debate with these Glen Beck wannabes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Links